Commentary
When you think of a local police station—not the headquarters building but a smaller neighbourhood branch—what comes to mind? Likely a few things: a sense of security that the police are nearby if trouble brews, a place to touch base with law enforcement officers, perhaps a way for police to engage in outreach with residents. Overall, a positive vibe.
What, then, comes to mind when you learn that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has set up a “police station” around the corner from your house? Likely anything but the scenarios just listed.
And what has been China’s official line about these stations, which it initially claimed did not exist? These were merely service centres to help Chinese citizens renew their driver’s licences! Simply above-board services to aid fellow communists in need.
These so-called police stations were, in reality, covert operations engaged in “transnational repression”—a practice aimed at silencing anyone who fails to conform to the PRC’s dictates. Tactics include threats to critics’ families back home if their activities abroad do not cease.
As for Canada, its response to Chinese interference remains feeble. The federal government shows little indication of treating this aggression against democracy seriously, as evidenced by its foot-dragging on the Foreign Interference Commission. Even if it did pass a law establishing a foreign agent registry, has anyone seen concrete action? Meanwhile, Beijing continues its campaign of intimidation unabated.
With the Trudeau Liberals facing potential electoral defeat, it remains to be seen how a new government, possibly under Pierre Poilievre, will address this threat. It cannot do less than the current administration, but whether it will do more is uncertain.
The Christmas season is a time for joy, hope, and optimism. Let us dream that Canada will finally “smell the soy sauce” and push back against the actions of Beijing, a communist regime that is undeniably not a friend.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Source link
Add comment